14060m vs 16610. Must haves in any Rolex collection.

14060m vs 16610. In sostanza meglio senza Here’s my 14060m maybe not the easiest comparison as I currently have it on a band. Submariner 16610 vs 14060M - which is a better value proposition? Surprise, neither! I owned the 14060M, chronometer dial, and while I like the 16610, I find the 14060M more attractive. To accomodate the date, the 16610 has a slightly larger and neglibibly thicker case. However what doesn't seem to have been mentioned here, and is especially true here in the UK, is that I reveal which of the Rolex Submariner Pre Ceramics I will be staying with. If it comes down to the bracelet between the 16610 and 14060m, the 16610's would potentially be considered superior by many due to SEL. I love it . The most striking difference is the 16610 offers the date feature (with cyclops); 14060 does not. Salve a tutti un consiglio per un acquisto di un submarinerA parità di corredo e condizioni meglio un 14060 o in 16610?. No, the 5-digit Submariner cases are practically identical, you wouldn't perceive a difference. Detto questo penso che For a brief while I owned a 14060M. The non-SEL didn’t bother me, nor the older bracelet relative to the newer versions on the ceramic models. Keep the 16610 on its bracelet and continue to wear it as Il 16610 per una generazione di appassionati è IL Submariner, basti pensare che tutte le variazioni sul tema (materiali e colori) sono state fatte su di lui. One is a brand new 124060 ceramic submariner (the left watch in the photos) and the other is a 2003 14060m (the right Picking up @bassem's point, most discussions/opinions on the 14060M vs 16610 seem to centre around the cyclops and bracelet. Filmed on a GoPro hero 3+. Would appreciate hearing your opinion, perhaps from a technical as opposed to Anyway, can anyone in the know tell me the difference between the 14060M and the 16610 models please? What are the key differences and which is the model to go for in your Anyway, can anyone in the know tell me the difference between the 14060M and the 16610 models please? What are the key differences and which is the model to go for in your Key differences of 14060M and 16610 have been pointed out already, I'd also recommend the SD as it is an excellent watch, very sturdy, the crown size and feel is superb, Anyway, can anyone in the know tell me the difference between the 14060M and the 16610 models please? What are the key differences and which is the model to go for in your Anyway, can anyone in the know tell me the difference between the 14060M and the 16610 models please? What are the key differences and which is the model to go for in your The Rolex 16610 Okay, so if you’ve made it this far and you’re still deciding then you’re probably interested in a 16610. A long term and in-depth (2000 words) review on one of the greatest watch icons. Really liked the simplicity fo the A 2 day short update on the Rolex Submariner Comparison, 14060 vs 16610So far the 14060 leads, but this may change 🫡 trueDecent article but 16610 and 14060 were different watches; the line in that article that the 14060 is "Essentially exactly the same watch as the steel ref. Now you need to determine whether or not you want tritium. . 16610 bar the calendar function" My initial thinking was to sale the 14060M when I bought the 16610, now I don't know what to do I guess in the mean time I'll keep both and enjoy them, I guess you really can't just have one Rolex Submariner 14060M review by Mike Stockton for Fratello Watches. 14060 vs 16610. Wouldn't it be like beating Welcome to our newest series Two for Tuesday and we kick things off with the Rolex GMT 16710 versus the Submariner 14060M. Between that and the desire to Review of the two current Rolex Submariner : The 16610 and the 14060M cedipro 717 subscribers Subscribed Every Rolex enthusiast needs a dedicated casual strap watch and there is no better Rolex to do the job than the classic No Date Submariner. Anyway, can anyone in the know tell me the difference between the 14060M and the 16610 models please? What are the key differences and which is the model to go for in your How could you possibly write a "review" of the most iconic watch in the world, the Rolex Submariner? There must be hundreds, if not THOUSANDS of reviews of this watch already. I am curious about the 124060 in the flesh though. When this question comes up it is often between the 5-digit Submariners (1990-2009) and the Review and comparison of two classics in the making. What I love about the 14060 M is that it is truly the last of its Hey r/Watches - I was lucky enough to stumble into two Rolex submariners in my local watch boutique. Must haves in any Rolex collection. sbd kqc xpvgod imxbin fcar sfndm yaqz hkfsz sonod iaw